My first confrontation
As I mentioned in my last post, on the way back from a off-road ride the other day I was badly cut up by a car - for no reason that I can understand. There were two lanes for traffic going in the same direction, and the car decided that instead of changing into the empty lane it was better to drive past me with only a few inches to spare going considerably faster than I was while going round a bend. This caused me to have to dive into the deep puddles at the side of the road to avoid being taken out.
Now I am not saying that this was a deliberate move rather than complete incompetence - but the driver of said car was obviously spoiling for an argument. At the next set of lights I had caught the car up. I decided to move into the other empty lane. I will admit I did take a rather long, slightly angry look over at the driver as I stopped, but no sooner had shed my momentum, the guys window came down and a shout of 'what' emanated from the dry and comfortable interior and out into the cold and rain.
Since he asked, I thought I would enlighten him on the errors of his ways (as I saw them). He in turn professed that I should not 'hog' the road. I retorted by pointing out that I was only a metre from the curb, and directly to the inside of me was a temporary river caused by the current precipitation, and it would not be safe or pleasant to ride through it as I would not see any pot holes and would more than likely fall off directly in front of him.
I also mentioned that there was a lane completely bereft of traffic that he had been free to utilise at any point for the last half mile or so - and maybe should use the mirrors that Fiat had kindly fashioned him with, as they had done this for use in situations both similar too and indeed exactly like this one.
His only answer to this, "I should have got out of his way"
And then it came - I knew it would at some point, but so soon?, not on the first altercation surely?.
"Well mate, you don't pay road tax, so you have to get out of my way".
Now, I have had a driving license for many years. Since I was old enough to get one. I have had several cars and a motor bike, I am a keen driver and I have loved driving every one of these machines across this country and others and have always seen the ability to do so as a privilege.
Yet in all of that time I have never paid "road tax". Not one penny of "road tax". Never. Nor had he. Nor have you (if you drive in the United Kingdom and are under the grand old age of 92).
Any link between the tax that you pay to use a vehicle and the maintenance of the road network was severed in 1937 - in a process that was started by Sir Winston Churchill. Road tax in no way entitles you to use of the road. The payment to use a car on the road has no direct relation to maintaining the road network, the roads are maintained from funds raised by general taxation at a national and local level. The duty paid for the disc you display is based on the emissions of a vehicle, engine size and age - nothing else.
There are plenty of cars that pay zero, nil nothing in road tax per year due to green credentials - so even if a bike had to display a disc - it would still be free.
Have you ever reported a pothole or other hazard to the DVLA? - or was it the local council that you called?
This kind of attitude is a big problem - there are thousands of references to the same issue all over the internet - so I will not try to fit anymore into this post - but will hopefully come back to it after a little more research.
While I can understand the frustrations of drivers with bikes (there is some shocking and down right dangerous riding going on out there), the idea that a car has more right to be there than a bike is ridiculous and wrong.
I would just like to mention to the driver that cut me up and used this line of defence with me, that I drive a car with a considerably larger engine than the one he was driving - so using his logic - is it ok if I cut him up when I am in it - after all the tax on my sports car is more than his Fiat by a margin - so should I not be getting value for money by ignoring his presence on the road. Equally - would he feel comfortable forcing a VW golf blue motion off the road, or maybe accusing the next BMW 1 series 1.6D driver of having no right to be on his road (both of which pay zero tax per year -
click here for more examples - there are lots).
Sorry mate - but the tax issue is a non starter. There are other issues with cyclist that do have more legs - but not this one - and if you want to pay nothing for fuel and nothing for "road tax" or Vehicle Excise Duty (VED*), you know the one you have to pay to use a car on the road - why not try riding a bike for a bit!
* "Known formally as Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) or Graduated VED, the amount of car tax you pay depends on the car's engine size or official CO2 emissions and the date of first registration."
The AA